<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" > <channel> <title>Media Scribbler &#187; screeners</title> <atom:link href="http://www.mediascribbler.com/tag/screeners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /> <link>http://www.mediascribbler.com</link> <description>For all the latest show biz news, the best of entertainment programming, and insider reviews.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item> <title>Critics Not Getting Any Love, Or Screeners Either</title> <link>http://www.mediascribbler.com/2008/08/critics-not-getting-any-love-or-screeners-either/</link> <comments>http://www.mediascribbler.com/2008/08/critics-not-getting-any-love-or-screeners-either/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:37:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator></dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Projects]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Television Industry]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Upfronts]]></category> <category><![CDATA[90220]]></category> <category><![CDATA[abc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cbs]]></category> <category><![CDATA[cw]]></category> <category><![CDATA[fox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[kath & kim]]></category> <category><![CDATA[life on mars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[my own worst enemy]]></category> <category><![CDATA[nbc]]></category> <category><![CDATA[screeners]]></category> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediascribbler.com/critics-not-getting-any-love-or-screeners-either/</guid> <description><![CDATA[When you&#8217;ve got a hot new show that&#8217;s already creating controversy before showing more than a 30-second preview, what&#8217;s the best way to deal with it? For several shows this season, that means not sending TV writers a screening DVD of the new show&#8217;s pilot before it debuts. Officials with the CW issued a statement Monday saying that they and CBS Paramount Television would not be screening the first ep of &#8220;90210&#8243; before it premieres  Sept. 2. They said the move was not made because they were concerned about critical reviews of the show hurting its ratings, but that they&#8217;re &#8220;simply [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.mediascribbler.com">Media Scribbler</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://b5media_b4.s3.amazonaws.com/81/files/2008/08/90210.jpg" title="90210"><img src="http://b5media_b4.s3.amazonaws.com/81/files/2008/08/90210.jpg" alt="90210" align="left" /></a>When you&#8217;ve got a hot new show that&#8217;s already creating controversy before showing more than a 30-second preview, what&#8217;s the best way to deal with it? For several shows this season, that means not sending TV writers a screening DVD of the new show&#8217;s pilot before it debuts.</p> <p>Officials with the <strong>CW</strong> issued a statement Monday saying that they and CBS Paramount Television would not be screening the first ep of <strong><a href="http://www.cwtv.com/shows/90210" target="_blank">&#8220;90210&#8243;</a></strong> before it premieres  Sept. 2. They said the move was not made because they were concerned about critical reviews of the show hurting its ratings, but that they&#8217;re &#8220;simply keeping a lid on 90210 until 9.02, riding the curiosity and anticipation into premiere night, and letting all our constituents see it at the same time.&#8221;</p> <p><span id="more-114"></span> Nice try CW, but one has to wonder why all the buzz about the show is about former characters from its parent show &#8220;<strong>Beverly Hills 90210</strong>&#8221; returning and not about the newbies in the ZIP Code. It would&#8217;ve been good for viewers to know more about the characters than their names before the show airs. Why not follow the lead of &#8220;<strong>Gossip Girl</strong>&#8221; and put the pilot up for free a few days before it airs? That didn&#8217;t seem to hurt the buzz for that show.</p> <p>&#8220;90210&#8243; isn&#8217;t the only show that&#8217;s staying under wraps before its network debut. Pilots are usually completed by May to send to critics before the TCA panels in June. However, <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117990524.html?categoryid=14&amp;cs=1&amp;nid=2565" target="_blank">Variety sez</a> that only <strong>CBS</strong> completed their pilots before the upfronts in May and had them ready by mid-June.</p> <p>Most of the blame for the pilot no-shows was laid on the <strong>WGA strike</strong>, when scribes were out of commission until mid-February. The CW and <strong>NBC</strong> ordered new shows for fall without pilot scripts completed, while <strong>ABC</strong> and <strong>Fox</strong> spread their development period out through the summer.</p> <p>The effects of the new scheduling have already made things tough for ABC and NBC, who have completely redone pilots for &#8220;Life on Mars&#8221; and &#8220;Kath &amp; Kim&#8221;, respectively. Both shows are remakes of foreign hits, and the networks apparently didn&#8217;t care for how they translated their moves across the pond.</p> <p>Instead of shelving them they&#8217;re reworking them, which not only makes them hard to promote (we&#8217;ll probably never see that scene where Kath comes across her mom and her boyfriend in matching gold robes, which has been shown countless times during the Olympics) but also doesn&#8217;t give critics a chance to know more about them than their troubled development.</p> <p>Despite the delays, NBC told Variety that they plan to send screeners out for their new shows before their premieres on TV (except for &#8220;<strong>My Own Worst Enemy</strong>&#8220;, which won&#8217;t be ready to go until mid-September. ABC won&#8217;t do likewise, but said they would provide streaming video via their publicity Web site.</p> <p>Since the said site tends to not permit most blogging sites with material to promote shows, that strategy might backfire on them.  It almost makes one wonder if they&#8217;re more concerned about screeners showing up on P2P sites than just making things easier for themselves or their pre-chosen &#8220;critics&#8221;.</p> <p>(Photo: The CW)</p> <p>Post from: <a href="http://www.mediascribbler.com">Media Scribbler</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediascribbler.com/2008/08/critics-not-getting-any-love-or-screeners-either/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>